Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1431 HB 184 The following was read the second time: 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1432 HOUSE BILL NO. 184 "An Act relating to the business of insurance, including changes to the insurance code to implement federal financial services reforms for the business of insurance and to authorize the director of insurance to review criminal backgrounds for individuals applying to engage in the business of insurance; amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page L&C RPT FORTHCOMING CS(L&C) 2DP 4NR 1AM 1232 FN1: ZERO(CED) 1233 RECEIVED CS(L&C) NT 1286 JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 2DP 3NR 1AM 1355 FN1: ZERO(CED) 1356 Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 184(JUD) "An Act relating to insurance; amending Rule 402, Alaska Rules of Evidence; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was not offered. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 44, line 28, following "information.": Insert "(a)" Page 45, following line 4: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) A financial institution, insurance company or any other person who violates this section is liable to a depositor or customer for damages caused by the disclosure of the confidential records or information of the financial institution pertaining to the depositor or customer." 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1433 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House and lifted the call. **Representative Ogan was excused from a call of the House today due to illness. Representative Berkowitz placed a call of the House and lifted the call. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 184(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 15 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Dyson, Fate, Joule, Kapsner, Kookesh, McGuire, Moses, Scalzi, Whitaker Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Stevens, Williams, Wilson Excused: Masek, Ogan Absent: Kerttula And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 45, lines 1 - 4, following "under the": Delete all material. Insert "National Association of Insurance Commissioners, model regulations on privacy." 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1434 Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Rokeberg objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 184(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 20 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Fate, Green, Guess, Halcro, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, McGuire, Moses, Murkowski Nays: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Foster, Harris, Hayes, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Excused: Masek, Ogan Absent: Dyson And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was not offered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 184(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 184(JUD) was read the third time. Representative Hayes moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting due to a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Hayes was required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 184(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2001-05-01 House Journal Page 1435 CSHB 184(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 33 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Chenault, Cissna, Coghill, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Guess, Halcro, Harris, Hayes, Hudson, James, Joule, Kapsner, Kohring, Kookesh, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Scalzi, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Crawford, Croft, Davies, Kerttula, Moses Excused: Masek, Ogan And so, CSHB 184(JUD) passed the House. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Davies gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on CSHB 184(JUD) and it was taken up later.